Reported on page 3.

It's also [url=http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/sportbulls/10883530.Bulls_now_lodge_their_annual_returns/HERE[/url

[url=http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/sportbulls/10890734.Battle_over_Bradford_Bulls_may_go_to_court/shares, lies and courtrooms #nocomment[/url



[i"And the T&A understands that any transfer of shares in the company will not take place until that legal battle, which is against the two individuals and not the club, has been resolved, which could be in a court hearing early next year.



Last night Mr Khan said he was unable to comment on the issue of shareholdings because of the legal action he is taking against Mr Moore and Mr Whitcut.



No-one at the club was available to comment further yesterday.[/i"



So, wtf is actually going on? Does anyone know anything other than the spin from either side?



I'm guessing ok is still majority shareholder and wont transfer shares until the legal action is done, so the actual owner who isn't running the club is suing the potential owners who are running the club. We've run out of enemies so we've started to take ourselves apart, spiffing.



I'm starting to feel like i might be unavailable for comment until at least the first game in Feb.

seems like were back in situation we had with hood/caisley. guys actually running club not having a majority shareholding.

Yes it's part of the new "Heritage" shareholding - unfortunately we did not get to vote on our preferred option with this one